Citaat | Gerechtshof Amsterdam 30 januari 2018

Onder 3.2.4. Gerechtshof Amsterdam 30 januari 2018

Een alinea uit Gerechtshof Amsterdam 30 januari 2018, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2018:421.

With regard to the presence of [legal representative 1] and [legal representative 2] the representative of the economical operators explained that [D] from the UK company [X Ltd] had phoned and inquired on prices for future garlic deliveries, during which the representative of economical operators informed [D] of an upcoming visit from the European Commission’s anti-fraud office (OLAF) related to Sinotrading’s garlic trade with Pakistan. Following this information, [D] had insisted on legal representation during this visit. The representative of the economical operators was surprised and did not understand why his client insisted on their attendance at an OLAF visit to his premises with regard to his trade with Pakistan.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/7abae6985ca0b0314c4a67afe63e370d8db58851622e9685fee24abfae4aee4a. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 7abae6985ca0b0314c4a67afe63e370d8db58851622e9685fee24abfae4aee4a, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 47199 tot 47947.