Citaat | Gerechtshof Den Haag 7 november 2017

Onder 6.3 Gerechtshof Den Haag 7 november 2017

Een alinea uit Gerechtshof Den Haag 7 november 2017, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2017:4029.

In view of the technical problem defined in the patent, 08 and 021 are the most relevant documents cited in the proceedings which can equally qualify as closest prior art for assessing inventive step. They address the same purpose as the present patent and has the two active components of claim 1: only these two documents disclose an effective topical treatment of psoriasis using calcipotriol and an ester of betamethasone (betamethasone valerate in 08, betamethasone dipropionate in 021). Documents D7, D9-D10, D12, D16-D17 cannot qualify as closest prior art for the following reasons: D9 is not dedicated to the treatment of psoriasis and has a different purpose. D7, D10, D12, D16-D17 have the same purpose

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/79eabb8979799c920208eb3786ca30577c0b7b60e0a7c1d0416f7830f6ef3011. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 79eabb8979799c920208eb3786ca30577c0b7b60e0a7c1d0416f7830f6ef3011, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 33634 tot 34360.