Citaat | Gerechtshof Den Haag 10 maart 2017

Onder 9 Gerechtshof Den Haag 10 maart 2017

Een alinea uit Gerechtshof Den Haag 10 maart 2017, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2017:4306.

1. At the appeal hearing, the accused argued that the statements that he made to the FIOD/ECD with regard to the charges under 1 through 4, or at least parts thereof, are not an accurate representation of what he said there at the time or of what actually happened and that these statements can, therefore, as is the understanding of the Court of Appeal, not contribute to the evidence supporting the charges. Furthermore, the accused has argued that he was sometimes put under a little pressure, for instance by the reporting officers hitting the table, and that he signed the official reports of the interrogation – even though he did not want to sign them at first, he ended up signing – because he wanted to be rid of them. At the court session in the first instance, the accused argued that he felt pressured during the interrogations and that he did not say the things the reporting officers wrote down.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/99e5582dd21cd727427140ad0147e522a7699a237650a7728e420db292df6da8. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 99e5582dd21cd727427140ad0147e522a7699a237650a7728e420db292df6da8, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 95694 tot 96620.