Citaat | Hoge Raad 14 juni 2011

Alinea 181 Hoge Raad 14 juni 2011

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 14 juni 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BP0287.

"45. It is clear that there was an "interference by public authority" in the exercise of the applicants' freedom of expression which is guaranteed by paragraph 1 of Article 10. Such an interference entails a "violation" of Article 10 if it does not fall within one of the exceptions provided for in paragraph 2 (Handyside judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 21, par. 43; NJ 1978, 236). The Court therefore has to examine in turn whether the interference in the present case was "prescribed by law", whether it had an aim or aims that is or are legitimate under article 10 par. 2 and whether it was "necessary in a democratic society" for the aforesaid aim or aims.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/7cbf8a5687eaa21f7b972a12d2f6a73e1ef963c00f37b25231b307802f546c01. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 7cbf8a5687eaa21f7b972a12d2f6a73e1ef963c00f37b25231b307802f546c01, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 62664 tot 63354.