Citaat | Hoge Raad 5 juli 2016

Onder 2.4. Hoge Raad 5 juli 2016

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 5 juli 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1325.

120. However, the Court would emphasise that, having regard to the margin of appreciation which must be accorded to Contracting States in the matters of criminal justice and sentencing (see paragraphs 104 and 105 above), it is not its task to prescribe the form (executive or judicial) which that review should take. For the same reason, it is not for the Court to determine when that review should take place. This being said, the Court would also observe that the comparative and international law materials before it show clear support for the institution of a dedicated mechanism guaranteeing a review no later than twenty-five years after the imposition of a life sentence, with further periodic reviews thereafter (see paragraphs 117 and 118 above).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/b43d7a9c8bbb03329e92fb7c3f989a69156db44bebcf065324c46d00bf448346. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt b43d7a9c8bbb03329e92fb7c3f989a69156db44bebcf065324c46d00bf448346, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 42032 tot 42801.