Citaat | Hoge Raad 5 juli 2016

Onder 2.5. Hoge Raad 5 juli 2016

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 5 juli 2016, ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1325.

106. In the case of mentally ill prisoners, the Court has held that the assessment of whether particular conditions of detention are incompatible with the standards of Article 3 has to take into consideration the vulnerability of those persons and, in some cases, their inability to complain coherently or at all about how they are being affected by any particular treatment (see, for example, Herczegfalvy v. Austria, 24 September 1992, § 82, Series A no. 244, and Aerts v. Belgium, 30 July 1998, § 66, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V). In addition, it is not enough for such detainees to be examined and a diagnosis made; instead, it is essential that proper treatment for the problem diagnosed and suitable medical supervision should also be provided (see Raffray Taddei, cited above, § 59).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/b43d7a9c8bbb03329e92fb7c3f989a69156db44bebcf065324c46d00bf448346. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt b43d7a9c8bbb03329e92fb7c3f989a69156db44bebcf065324c46d00bf448346, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 57269 tot 58089.