Citaat | Hoge Raad 6 juni 2017

Onder 3.3.2. Hoge Raad 6 juni 2017

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 6 juni 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:1017.

"105. However, the use as evidence of statements obtained at the stage of a police inquiry and judicial investigation is not in itself inconsistent with Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d), provided that the rights of the defence have been respected. As a rule, these rights require that the defendant be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him - either when that witness is making his statements or at a later stage of the proceedings (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, § 118, with further references; see also A.G. v. Sweden (dec.), no. 315/09, 10 January 2012, and Trampevski v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 4570/07, § 44, 10 July 2012)."

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/f0d7a3f6bb16d501016fc8008acda917164db590183635a32a5af8cfc3ff5585. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt f0d7a3f6bb16d501016fc8008acda917164db590183635a32a5af8cfc3ff5585, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 64647 tot 65367.