Citaat | Hoge Raad 6 juni 2017

Onder 3.3.3. Hoge Raad 6 juni 2017

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 6 juni 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:1017.

"195. Article 6 § 3 (d) enshrines the principle that, before an accused can be convicted, all evidence against him must normally be produced in his presence at a public hearing with a view to adversarial argument. Exceptions to this principle are possible but must not infringe the rights of the defence, which, as a rule, require that the accused should be given an adequate and proper opportunity to challenge and question a witness against him (...). This principle requires that a defendant should know the identity of his accusers so that he is in a position to challenge their probity and credibility and should be able to test the truthfulness and reliability of their evidence, by having them orally examined in his presence, either at the time the witness was making the statement or at some later stage of the proceedings (...)"

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/f0d7a3f6bb16d501016fc8008acda917164db590183635a32a5af8cfc3ff5585. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt f0d7a3f6bb16d501016fc8008acda917164db590183635a32a5af8cfc3ff5585, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 65646 tot 66498.