Citaat | Hoge Raad 30 mei 2017

Onder 2.1. Hoge Raad 30 mei 2017

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 30 mei 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:967.

Just like their father and patriarch of the company, collaborated with the Nazi's. After WWII he had no problem to continue working with Nazi's. For example: Dr.ing. Fritz Arthur Mucke, high ranking purchaser for the "Reichsministerium für die besetzten Ostgebiete" (Reich ministry for "purchasing" aft and other possessions in the occupied East Area's) was charged by the Dutch government for illegally acquiring art belonging to victims of the nazi's and simultaneously enriching himself, he selected out of the at that time only non-Jewish available lawyers [betrokkene 1] (his Jewish collegues were extirpated, while he kept on working during three years under Nazi Law) as his representative..........he had enjoyed fully the fruits of his conduct during and after the war"

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/3edeaa743ff15a0e9c1ba54b09a11879924c7a064a67e698adb205216ae1ac3b. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 3edeaa743ff15a0e9c1ba54b09a11879924c7a064a67e698adb205216ae1ac3b, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 16788 tot 17580.