Citaat | Hoge Raad 18 december 2018
Onder 5.2. Hoge Raad 18 december 2018
Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 18 december 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:2349.
It can be inferred from the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (below: ECtHR) that the possibility cannot be excluded that in exceptional circumstances it may be permissible to grant an amnesty for war crimes despite the treaty obligations referred to above, for example where there is or has been a reconciliation process and/or a form of compensation for victims. (See, for example, the judgment of the ECtHR of 27 May 2014, no. 4455/10 (Marguš v. Croatia), paragraph 139 in conjunction with paragraph 127). As is also evident from that case law, however, under international law it cannot be lightly assumed that prosecution can be dispensed with on account of an amnesty (see, for example, paragraphs 124-140 of the above-mentioned judgment and the decision of the ECtHR of 17 March 2009, no. 13113/03 (Ould Dah v. France)).
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/388af2069f47f1b259f67e58fda890a0d1133421d38e06529eee78b481d75bca. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 388af2069f47f1b259f67e58fda890a0d1133421d38e06529eee78b481d75bca, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 29280 tot 30135.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/388af2069f47f1b259f67e58fda890a0d1133421d38e06529eee78b481d75bca | shasum -a 256