Citaat | Hoge Raad 15 juni 2018

Onder 3.1 Hoge Raad 15 juni 2018

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 15 juni 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:918.

Both parties actually requested that the arbitration be discontinued, although each of them on different grounds: The Claimant, because it considered the review request of the other party to be legally ineffective and withdrew its own request so there is nothing to be heard, while the Defendant, because the matter was actually resolved back in 2002 so there is nothing to be heard and all the subsequent decisions are null and void and all the subsequent procedural acts are ineffective. Both parties identically moved that the proceedings be discontinued while both of them claimed that there was nothing to be heard, although each of them on completely different grounds.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/fdff564c219954c0cd14d5eeb7d80422d41b7d86ab4aaa8abfe3313739fc1eca. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt fdff564c219954c0cd14d5eeb7d80422d41b7d86ab4aaa8abfe3313739fc1eca, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 13562 tot 14250.