Citaat | Hoge Raad 20 december 2019

Onder 5.3.3 Hoge Raad 20 december 2019

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 20 december 2019, ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2006.

“76. The Court reiterates that it is not its task to determine what exactly should have been done in the present situation to reduce the impact of the plant’s activities upon the applicants in a more efficient way. However, it is within the Court’s jurisdiction to assess whether the Government approached the problem with due diligence and gave consideration to all the competing interests. In this respect the Court reiterates that the onus is on the State to justify, using detailed and rigorous data, a situation in which certain individuals bear a heavy burden on behalf of the rest of the community (see Fadeyeva, cited above, § 128). Looking at the present case from this perspective, the Court notes that the Government did not present to the Court any relevant environmental studies or documents informative of their policy towards the plant and the air pollution emanating therefrom that had been affecting the applicants during the period concerned.”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/3ba5ee01add758b3680270ac8a72bac3e9ac350cf350783c003d33ccba960d2f. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 3ba5ee01add758b3680270ac8a72bac3e9ac350cf350783c003d33ccba960d2f, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 97122 tot 98105.