Citaat | Hoge Raad 18 februari 2020
Onder 3.2.2 ‘ Hoge Raad 18 februari 2020
Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 18 februari 2020, ECLI:NL:HR:2020:285.
48. The right to have one’s conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher tribunal established under article 14, paragraph 5, imposes on the State party a duty to review substantively, both on the basis of sufficiency of the evidence and of the law, the conviction and sentence, such that the procedure allows for due consideration of the nature of the case. A review that is limited to the formal or legal aspects of the conviction without any consideration whatsoever of the facts is not sufficient under the Covenant. However, article 14, paragraph 5 does not require a full retrial or a “hearing”, as long as the tribunal carrying out the review can look at the factual dimensions of the case. Thus, for instance, where a higher instance court looks at the allegations against a convicted person in great detail, considers the evidence submitted at the trial and referred to in the appeal, and finds that there was sufficient incriminating evidence to justify a finding of guilt in the specific case, the Covenant is not violated.”
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/e80e2a64a7959c3ed0c17fa914bc2a5e354a3223b230c0821a5933f6dc7694be. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt e80e2a64a7959c3ed0c17fa914bc2a5e354a3223b230c0821a5933f6dc7694be, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 15498 tot 16553.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/e80e2a64a7959c3ed0c17fa914bc2a5e354a3223b230c0821a5933f6dc7694be | shasum -a 256