Citaat | Hoge Raad 29 maart 2022

Onder 2.4.5 Hoge Raad 29 maart 2022

Een alinea uit Hoge Raad 29 maart 2022, ECLI:NL:HR:2022:466.

121. It is not for the Court to compile a list of specific measures which the domestic courts must have taken in order to have made all reasonable efforts to secure the attendance of a witness whom they finally considered to be unreachable (see Tseber, cited above, § 49). However, it is clear that they must have actively searched for the witness with the help of the domestic authorities including the police (see Salikhov, cited above, §§ 116-17; Prăjină v. Romania, no. 5592/05, § 47, 7 January 2014; and Lučić, cited above, § 79) and must, as a rule, have resorted to international legal assistance where a witness resided abroad and such mechanisms were available (see Gabrielyan, cited above, § 83; Fąfrowicz, cited above, § 56; Lučić, cited above, § 80; and Nikolitsas, cited above, § 35).”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/c0e2df391db4aedb89d7f4d08696ce4c56bb098899ae67d1db67011b6c2aedbc. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt c0e2df391db4aedb89d7f4d08696ce4c56bb098899ae67d1db67011b6c2aedbc, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 28545 tot 29374.