Citaat | Gerecht in eerste aanleg van Curaçao 31 oktober 2022

Onder 2.7. Gerecht in eerste aanleg van Curaçao 31 oktober 2022

Een alinea uit Gerecht in eerste aanleg van Curaçao 31 oktober 2022, ECLI:NL:OGEAC:2022:373.

7. At the interim hearing on 30 July 2015 Mostyn J invited the wife to apply for permission under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. Mostyn J by all accounts, and understandably, indicated that on the basis that the husband was asserting that the parties were already divorced, and because the wife did not challenge the Talaq divorce, the court was entitled to proceed on the basis that the requirements in the Family Law Act 1986 had been met. The wife then made her actual application under Part III on the following day, on 31 July 2015, without prejudice to her English divorce petition and the jurisdiction thus seized under Brussels II. Since then, the wife’s claim for a financial remedy has proceeded under Part III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. Further to Mostyn J’s order that she have permission to amend her application under Part III in January 2016 on the basis of 12 months’ habitual residence, the wife filed an amended D50F (her application for financial relief after an overseas divorce) on 31 July 2016.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/45ef0f818c342b9e80b8e6c46176b89d939044535a2683830dec16755f69ccc6. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 45ef0f818c342b9e80b8e6c46176b89d939044535a2683830dec16755f69ccc6, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 9884 tot 11015.