Citaat | Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 15 november 2016

Onder 4.6. Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 15 november 2016

Een alinea uit Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 15 november 2016, ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2016:130.

118. In the present case, the completion of the first step was subject to the condition of the “ execution and delivery ” of the Final SPA within the time set forth at Article 5(1)(c) of the LA, such execution and delivery entailing as per Article 5(l)(b) the termination of the LA. Based on the wording of the parties' agreement, failing completion of this condition, the second step could not occur, the LA being likewise terminated and the transaction abandoned. This must logically mean that the LA and the SPA were intended by the parties to be distinct, successive and separate agreements, each of them standing on its own. Logically, it must also follow that the SPA was not intended to be an accessory, a supplement to the LA or its mere extension. Furthermore, in regard to the SPA, the LA cannot be considered as the main contract, nor as a framework agreement, such an exclusive distribution agreement covering individual sale contracts concluded thereafter.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/a1fc1e9d6fa0d16354ed916f131d717a3c85767a1ab93965c29c2cff4367be36. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt a1fc1e9d6fa0d16354ed916f131d717a3c85767a1ab93965c29c2cff4367be36, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 22864 tot 23883.