Citaat | Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 15 november 2016

Onder 4.6. Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 15 november 2016

Een alinea uit Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 15 november 2016, ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2016:130.

122. However, the fact remains that, notwithstanding the insertion in the DSPA of an arbitration clause, the LA Tribunal nevertheless extended the application of the arbitration agreement of the LA to disputes arising out of the final SPA on the ground that the claim for delivery of the Class B shares was only pending before it, neither party having mentioned any pending proceedings under the final SPA. For the LA Tribunal, a lis pendens or preclusion situation which would justify a declining of its jurisdiction did not exist (…). This Arbitral Tribunal has difficulties in following the approach of the LA Tribunal. When two arbitration agreements are contained in two distinct and separate agreements, it must be presumed that the more recent dispute resolution agreement takes priority over the earlier agreement (…); and that, irrespective of whether or not an arbitration proceeding is also pending under the subsequent agreement as mistakenly affirmed by the LA Tribunal.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/a1fc1e9d6fa0d16354ed916f131d717a3c85767a1ab93965c29c2cff4367be36. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt a1fc1e9d6fa0d16354ed916f131d717a3c85767a1ab93965c29c2cff4367be36, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 24221 tot 25256.