Citaat | Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 11 oktober 2022

Onder 4.8. Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 11 oktober 2022

Een alinea uit Gemeenschappelijk Hof van Justitie van Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten en van Bonaire, Sint Eustatius en Saba 11 oktober 2022, ECLI:NL:OGHACMB:2022:104.

187. Where the impugned information was already publicly available, the Court has had regard to this factor in its assessment of whether the impugned restriction on freedom of speech was “necessary” for the purposes of Article 10 § 2. In some cases it has been a decisive consideration leading the Court to find a violation of the Article 10 guarantee (see Weber v. Switzerland, 22 May 1990, §§ 48-52, Series A no. 177; Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, §§ 66-71, Series A no. 216; The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 26 November 1991, §§ 52-56, Series A no. 217; and Vereniging Weekblad Bluf! v. the Netherlands, 9 February 1995, §§ 41-46, Series A no. 306-A) while in others, notably regarding the freedom of the press to report on public court proceedings, the fact that the information was in the public domain was found to be outweighed by the need to protect the right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the Convention (see Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway, no. 34438/04, §§ 62-63, 16 April 2009; and Shabanov and Tren v. Russia, no. 5433/02, §§ 44-50, 14 December 2006).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/8a81ca71c603df24a7bf4b7e97f4ab4ef81b0dfdbe1a23e32219355f7bbc6d37. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 8a81ca71c603df24a7bf4b7e97f4ab4ef81b0dfdbe1a23e32219355f7bbc6d37, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 38271 tot 39429.