Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 oktober 1997

Alinea 43 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 oktober 1997

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 oktober 1997, ECLI:NL:PHR:1997:52.

"The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 1 obliges the courts to give reasons for their judgments, but cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument (see Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 20, § 61). The extent to which this duty to give reasons applies may vary according to the nature of the decision. It is moreover necessary to take into account, inter alia, the diversity of the submissions that a litigant may bring before the courts and the differences existing in the Contracting States with regard to statutory provisions, customary rules, legal opinion and the presentation and drafting of judgments. That is why the question whether a court has failed to fulfil the obligation to state reasons, deriving from Article 6 of the Convention, can only be determined in the light of the circumstances of the case. "

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/afd8150ecf65bb446432df284a1ab6401f91643acffecb79f937793836164ab3. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt afd8150ecf65bb446432df284a1ab6401f91643acffecb79f937793836164ab3, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 17584 tot 18485.