Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 mei 2001

Alinea 134 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 mei 2001

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 mei 2001, ECLI:NL:PHR:2001:AB1844.

(10) Zie o.a. EHRM 1 oktober 1982 (Piersack), Series A, Vol. 53, § 30, onderdeel b : "It would be going too far (...) to maintain that former judicial officers in the public prosecutor's department were unable to sit on the bench in every case that had been examined initially by that department, even though they had never had to deal with the case themselves. So radical a solution, based on an inflexible and formalistic conception of the unity and indivisibility of the public prosecutor's department, would erect a virtually impenetrable barrier between that department and the bench. it would lead to an upheaval in the judicial system of several Contracting States where transfers from one of thoze offices to the other are a frequent occurrence. Above all, the mere fact that a judge was once a member of the public prosecutor's department is not a reason for fearing that he lacks impartiality (...)."

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/129cc017257172acc924db404d64d13c5467fe46e89671ada01ee71cc974ea10. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 129cc017257172acc924db404d64d13c5467fe46e89671ada01ee71cc974ea10, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 42913 tot 43838.