Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 juni 2002

Alinea 25 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 juni 2002

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 juni 2002, ECLI:NL:PHR:2002:AD9474.

2. The applicant argues that it was essential for the clock to have been presented at the hearing. He had wished to demonstrate to the Court of Appeal that there had been no reason for him to assume that the clock contained cocaine. He had, however, been deprived of this possibility because the clock had been destroyed by mistake; nevertheless, the Court of Appeal had held in its judgment, on the basis of the official record drawn up by the police officer and the customs officer on 14 April 1993 that the wooden body of the clock had been "rather thick" and come to the conclusion on that basis that the applicant was, or ought to have been, aware that it contained cocaine.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/a73df7553a8fa2f4daad060f2ef3ab799393d39acd43c8d6fbec6a2a14df9f56. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt a73df7553a8fa2f4daad060f2ef3ab799393d39acd43c8d6fbec6a2a14df9f56, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 11561 tot 12255.