Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 juni 2002

Alinea 26 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 juni 2002

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 juni 2002, ECLI:NL:PHR:2002:AD9474.

The Court notes that the case-file of the domestic proceedings contained photographs of the clock and that the applicant did not state before the Court of Appeal that these photographs were insufficient to convey a good impression of the clock's appearance. True, he did so state before the Supreme Court; the Supreme Court held, however, that it was not possible to raise such a complaint for the first time in an appeal on points of law. Moreover, the applicant's conviction was not based to a decisive extent on the appearance of the clock, but on other evidence as well - including the Court of Appeal's assessment of statements made by the applicant himself. The Court is of the opinion that in these circumstances the failure to produce the clock at the hearing did not unduly prejudice the rights of the defence.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/a73df7553a8fa2f4daad060f2ef3ab799393d39acd43c8d6fbec6a2a14df9f56. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt a73df7553a8fa2f4daad060f2ef3ab799393d39acd43c8d6fbec6a2a14df9f56, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 12275 tot 13110.