Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 24 januari 2003

Alinea 52 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 24 januari 2003

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 24 januari 2003, ECLI:NL:PHR:2003:AF0148.

"80. The Court notes that on these two dates, in accordance with the relevant procedural rules, documents before the hearing, in particular social reports updating the information on the child A., reviewing the history of the case and making recommendations, were not disclosed to the second applicant or the first applicant acting as her representative, although the chairman of the hearing did inform them of the substance of the documents. On 4 February 1988 the children's hearing decided that A. did need compulsory measures of care, notably because of the mental health of both applicants, and a supervision requirement was made placing A. under the supervision of the local authority subject to the condition that he reside with foster parents; this supervision requirement being continued at the following hearing on 13 October 1988. These were the two sole occasions of such non-disclosure when the second applicant had participated in the proceedings and a decision affecting her civil rights had been taken - other than the decision on 5 September 1989, which was quashed on appeal (see in addition).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/e9bf48bb5b832a1794462944dc5b6a3cd590bc1deeefd6a44515a55c810f044b. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt e9bf48bb5b832a1794462944dc5b6a3cd590bc1deeefd6a44515a55c810f044b, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 18357 tot 19481.