Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 mei 2003

Alinea 87 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 mei 2003

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 mei 2003, ECLI:NL:PHR:2003:AF5704.

14. The Regional Court, aware of the shortcomings in the taking of evidence, ordered a psychological expert opinion on S.'s credibility which was eventually prepared in October 1994, i.e. one and a half years after the relevant events. The girl was again not heard in court on account of her parents' refusal, which was motivated by the possible risk to her health. In addition to the evidence available at first instance, the Regional Court had at its disposal an expert opinion on S.'s credibility. However, considering the delay of about eighteen months between the event in question and the preparation of this opinion, the Court finds that in the present circumstances, the procedure followed by the judicial authorities cannot be considered as having enabled the defence to challenge the evidence of S., reported in court by third persons, one of them a close relative.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/11149d4f478e1650c95172ac527249095ca2eda7c2088f8232adb7e4c65aba29. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 11149d4f478e1650c95172ac527249095ca2eda7c2088f8232adb7e4c65aba29, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 32219 tot 33107.