Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 25 november 2003

Alinea 38 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 25 november 2003

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 25 november 2003, ECLI:NL:PHR:2003:AM2772.

14. The Regional Court, aware of the shortcomings in the taking of evidence, ordered a psychological expert opinion on S.'s credibility which was eventually prepared in October 1994, i.e. one and a half years after the relevant events. The girl was again not heard in court on account of her parents' refusal, which was motivated by the possible risk to her health. In addition to the evidence available at first instance, the Regional Court had at its disposal an expert opinion on S.'s credibility. However, considering the delay of about eighteen months between the event in question and the preparation of this opinion, the Court finds that in the present circumstances, the procedure followed by the judicial authorities cannot be considered as having enabled the defence to challenge the evidence of S., reported in court by third persons, one of them a close relative.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/7ea2ee4e94ddf124b8ada5263be44c061567b3c01a438e0aaa9ee3140dccfb20. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 7ea2ee4e94ddf124b8ada5263be44c061567b3c01a438e0aaa9ee3140dccfb20, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 16774 tot 17662.