Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 maart 2004

Alinea 68 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 maart 2004

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 maart 2004, ECLI:NL:PHR:2004:AO1991.

93. The Court accepts that when action has to be taken to protect a child in an emergency, it may not always be possible, because of the urgency of the situation, to associate in the decision-making process those having custody of the child. Nor, as the Government point out, may it even be desirable, even if possible, to do so if those having custody of the child are seen as the source of an immediate threat to the child, since giving them prior warning would be liable to deprive the measure of its effectiveness. The Court must however be satisfied that the national authorities were entitled to consider that there existed circumstances justifying the abrupt removal of the child from the care of its parents without any prior contact or consultation. In particular, it is for the respondent State to establish that a careful assessment of the impact of the proposed care measure on the parents and the child, as well as of the possible alternatives to the removal of the child from its family, was carried out prior to the implementation of a care measure (see K. and T. v. Finland, cited above, § 166)(20).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/190872eed647fb3fe92c07d2c10e3533c4f6471f6cce98a948b153263b252fb3. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 190872eed647fb3fe92c07d2c10e3533c4f6471f6cce98a948b153263b252fb3, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 25481 tot 26610.