Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 18 mei 2004

Alinea 53 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 18 mei 2004

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 18 mei 2004, ECLI:NL:PHR:2004:AO5050.

58. Under the second, it must determined whether, quite apart from the judge's conduct, there are ascertainable facts which may raise doubts as to his impartiality. In this respect even appearances may be of a certain importance. What is at stake is the confidence which the courts in a democratic society must inspire in the public. This implies that in deciding whether in a given case there is a legitimate reason to fear that a particular judge lacks impartiality, the standpoint of the accused is important but not decisive. What is decisive is whether this fear can be held objectively justified (see the Hauschildt judgment, cited above, p. 21, § 48, and, mutatis mutandis, the Fey v. Austria judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255-A, p. 12, § 30 (NJ 1993, 649; red.)).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/854c19e006bf695b21d8dd2666acafadf885713bd7291ab83310c3f66283595e. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 854c19e006bf695b21d8dd2666acafadf885713bd7291ab83310c3f66283595e, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 23070 tot 23869.