Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 oktober 2006

Alinea 33 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 oktober 2006

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 oktober 2006, ECLI:NL:PHR:2006:AX5765.

"3. The Court notes that the expressions in question consisted of factual statements, not value-judgments (cf., for instance, the Lingens v. Austria judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 28, § 46). They did not emanate from the newspaper itself but were based on or were directly quoting from the Lindberg report,(2) which the newpaper had not verified by independent research (see the Jersild judgment cited above, pp. 23 and 25-26, §§ 31 and 35). It must therefore be examined whether there were any special grounds in the present case for dispensing the newspaper from its ordinary obligation to verify factual statements that were defamatory of private individuals."

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/bc664aa717183f7c217bf9ac99d63b27101f12991aea3cac7611e3eec3f42048. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt bc664aa717183f7c217bf9ac99d63b27101f12991aea3cac7611e3eec3f42048, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 22094 tot 22788.