Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 7 juli 2009

Alinea 371 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 7 juli 2009

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 7 juli 2009, ECLI:NL:PHR:2009:BI3413.

26. In the instant case, the Court notes that under Article 111-18 of the Code of Commercial Procedure the Supreme Court, having quashed the resolution of the Higher Commercial Court, could either have remitted the case for a fresh consideration by the lower court or nullified the proceedings (see paragraph 12 above). Instead it upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal and such course of action was not provided for under the Code of Commercial Procedure, as the Government admitted in their observations (see paragraph 19). The Court further notes that there was no other provision extending the Supreme Court's competence to this type of decision. Finally, the Court considers that the general provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, relied on by the Government (see paragraph 10 above) could not serve as a sufficient legal basis for a very specific competence not existing in the relevant procedural legislation.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/dcecd2a6ee989a360c77477dd4bbd94e95dbb219f23e50dbf3a1a1e36dd0cd4d. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt dcecd2a6ee989a360c77477dd4bbd94e95dbb219f23e50dbf3a1a1e36dd0cd4d, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 217804 tot 218741.