Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 15 november 2011

Alinea 289 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 15 november 2011

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 15 november 2011, ECLI:NL:PHR:2011:BP7544.

190. In light of the above considerations, the Court considers that the restrictions on the procedure before the IPT did not violate the applicant's right to a fair trial. In reaching this conclusion, the Court emphasises the breadth of access to the IPT enjoyed by those complaining about interception within the United Kingdom and the absence of any evidential burden to be overcome in order to lodge an application with the IPT. In order to ensure the efficacy of the secret surveillance regime, and bearing in mind the importance of such measures to the fight against terrorism and serious crime, the Court considers that the restrictions on the applicant's rights in the context of the proceedings before the IPT were both necessary and proportionate and did not impair the very essence of the applicant's Article 6 rights."

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/bc41f075c6f5e3cda14fd54ab23542ee9acd7e467bf6a3f99de2000cf05b73d7. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt bc41f075c6f5e3cda14fd54ab23542ee9acd7e467bf6a3f99de2000cf05b73d7, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 86192 tot 87034.