Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 december 2011

Alinea 33 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 december 2011

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 20 december 2011, ECLI:NL:PHR:2011:BT7086.

'Article 6 § 1 of the Convention requires that, as a rule, access to a lawyer should be provided as from the first interrogation of a suspect by the police, unless it is demonstrated in the light of the particular circumstances of each case that there are compelling reasons to restrict this right (see Salduz v. Turkey [GC], no. 36391/02, § 55, 27 November 2008; see also Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03, §§ 29-34, 13 October 2009). Even where compelling reasons may exceptionally justify denial of access to a lawyer, such restriction - whatever its justification - must not unduly prejudice the rights of the accused under Article 6 (ibid). The rights of the defence will in principle be irretrievably prejudiced when incriminating statements made during police interrogation without access to a lawyer are used for a conviction.'(7)

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/ed8b5c8f9d5f71290f2fe2c5133253c34b20dfdeaac5a4b11383bd12e6f9fe53. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt ed8b5c8f9d5f71290f2fe2c5133253c34b20dfdeaac5a4b11383bd12e6f9fe53, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 13391 tot 14243.