Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 24 januari 2012
Alinea 18 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 24 januari 2012
Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 24 januari 2012, ECLI:NL:PHR:2012:BU2064.
"42. The Court is aware of the fact that the decision taken by the Justice Ministry on the transfer request does not solely depend on the public prosecutor's recommendations and on considerations regarding the execution of sentence, but also on considerations of foreign policy which fall within the core area of public law. It is therefore acceptable if this part of the decision is not subject to judicial review. Accordingly, the Court has previously held that Article 6 § 1 was not applicable to proceedings under the Transfer Convention (see Csoszánski v. Sweden (dec.), no. 22318/02, 27 June 2006; Szabo v. Sweden (dec.), no. 28578/03, 27 June 2006; and Veermae v. Finland (dec.), no. 38704/03, 15 March 2005). However, in those cases the Transfer Convention was not prospectively influencing the course of the trial and the fixing of the sentence, because no assurance was given by the public prosecution before or during the criminal proceedings."
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/04cd3a32b833b4db2f1345ac060e9bf5da5dba160b9fb22767d92dfc01195fa8. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 04cd3a32b833b4db2f1345ac060e9bf5da5dba160b9fb22767d92dfc01195fa8, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 11834 tot 12804.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/04cd3a32b833b4db2f1345ac060e9bf5da5dba160b9fb22767d92dfc01195fa8 | shasum -a 256