Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 27 november 2012

Alinea 39 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 27 november 2012

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 27 november 2012, ECLI:NL:PHR:2012:BY8956.

Mr. JUVIGNY (France) said he would like to clear up a further point. The Belgian representative had also put forward the view that the words "without authorization" might refer to a refugee who had made application and been refused authorization, and still persisted in trying to remain in the country. Such a case was provided for by paragraph 2 of article 26, which stated that the status of refugees entering a country illegally must be "regularized". Hence, cases of such refugees would require investigation. If, as a result, it was decided for various reasons not to admit a refugee, and the refugee persisted in trying to remain in the territory, he would no longer come under article 26, but under the ordinary national law, i.e., the penalties laid down under the domestic law would be applicable.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/fd44bbeeeda13d72a6cb57e9f13c378ca11e9d0af43e6900eb4b2d64d7596b33. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt fd44bbeeeda13d72a6cb57e9f13c378ca11e9d0af43e6900eb4b2d64d7596b33, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 18924 tot 19743.