Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 27 november 2012

Alinea 42 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 27 november 2012

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 27 november 2012, ECLI:NL:PHR:2012:BY8956.

Mr. JUVIGNY (France) thought there was still another reason why his interpretation should be regarded as self-evident, as article 26 now stood. The first paragraph of the article involved a voluntary act. A person who presented himself to the authorities of a country after crossing its frontiers without authorization, was performing a voluntary act; whereas, in the case mentioned by the Belgian representative, the act was no longer voluntary, since the refugee who had entered illegally had been brought before the authorities by the police who discovered him. The refugee could therefore no longer benefit by the provision of article 26.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/fd44bbeeeda13d72a6cb57e9f13c378ca11e9d0af43e6900eb4b2d64d7596b33. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt fd44bbeeeda13d72a6cb57e9f13c378ca11e9d0af43e6900eb4b2d64d7596b33, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 20960 tot 21615.