Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 september 2013

Onder 5.6 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 september 2013

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 september 2013, ECLI:NL:PHR:2013:859.

In these particular circumstances, and bearing in mind that the Court itself has held in various cases that a finding of a violation in itself constituted adequate just satisfaction under Article 41 of the Convention for any non-pecuniary damages suffered, the Court accepts that the Supreme Court's finding of a violation of the applicant's rights under Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with the cost orders issued in the applicant's favour, and its instruction to the legislator to enact new legislation which has in fact occurred, may be regarded as adequate redress. Consequently, the applicant cannot be regarded as having a continuing legal interest warranting a determination by the Court that his rights under Article 14 of the Convention have been breached."(93)

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/d4f0c170374c2164a110e760d3258e5b3deed42ec3a1beded99913b3c0ed5d2d. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt d4f0c170374c2164a110e760d3258e5b3deed42ec3a1beded99913b3c0ed5d2d, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 217019 tot 217814.