Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 12 februari 2013

Alinea 80 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 12 februari 2013

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 12 februari 2013, ECLI:NL:PHR:2013:BY8434.

79. The Court further reiterates that where the 'lawfulness' of detention is in issue, including the question whether 'a procedure prescribed by law' has been followed, the Convention refers essentially to national law but also, where appropriate, to other applicable legal standards, including those which have their source in international law. In all cases it establishes the obligation to conform to the substantive and procedural rules of the laws concerned, but it also requires that any deprivation of liberty be compatible with the purpose of Article 5, namely, to protect the individual from arbitrariness (see, amongst many other authorities, Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, § 54, Series A no. 111; Amuur, cited above, § 50; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 8787/99, § 461, ECHR 2004-VII; Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 171, ECHR 2004-II; McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 30, ECHR 2006-X; and Mooren, cited above, § 76).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/f90eecfcd2ea432847345467b2074d6de088cd6c88ae9ed2cd3410b0ddb5a7ba. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt f90eecfcd2ea432847345467b2074d6de088cd6c88ae9ed2cd3410b0ddb5a7ba, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 51489 tot 52486.