Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013

Alinea 175 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 14 juni 2013, ECLI:NL:PHR:2013:CA2818.

In this respect the Court considers that the applicants did not have an expectation protected by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the tax rate would, at the time when they would have been able to draw benefits from the stock option programme according to the original terms of the programme, i.e. between 1 December 1998 and 31 January 2000, be the same as it was in 1994 when the applicants subscribed the bonds. The Court does not exclude that the situation might have to be assessed differently, had the law applied (which it did not) even to cases in which the exercise of the stock options was possible before 1 January 1995 according to the relevant terms and conditions of the stock option programmes in question. In such a situation, in which the applicants did not find themselves, taxation at a considerably higher tax rate than that in force on the date of the exercise of the stock options could arguably be regarded as an unreasonable interference with expectations protected by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/4e77cba48183285fd2dc148bfec222c8e6e52cf77bc951651cc6871aee894d17. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 4e77cba48183285fd2dc148bfec222c8e6e52cf77bc951651cc6871aee894d17, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 60549 tot 61582.