Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 19 december 2014

Onder 7.20 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 19 december 2014

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 19 december 2014, ECLI:NL:PHR:2014:2350.

“68. In determining whether a considerable mitigation of the sentence may be considered as having afforded the applicant sufficient redress for a breach of Article 6 § 1, the Court observes the following. Under the Court’s well-established case-law, Article 6 § 1 of the Convention does not permit the use of evidence obtained as a result of police incitement. For the trial to be fair within that provision, all evidence obtained as a result of police incitement must be excluded or a procedure with similar consequences must apply (see paragraphs 47 and 64 above). In view of this case-law, it must be concluded that any measure short of excluding such evidence at trial or leading to similar consequences must also be considered as insufficient to afford adequate redress for a breach of Article 6 § 1.”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/7fd7919fb3b37a2e2e715d1dbb851f3706cd0d57c2a8d6bd35f608c8e7c2ea64. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 7fd7919fb3b37a2e2e715d1dbb851f3706cd0d57c2a8d6bd35f608c8e7c2ea64, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 159528 tot 160358.