Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2015

Onder 20.1 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2015

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2015, ECLI:NL:PHR:2015:1295.

“51. Internationally there is a consensus that for children in conflict with the law the time between the commission of het offence and the final response to this act should be as short as possible. The longer this period, the more likely it is that the response loses its desired positive, pedagogical impact, and the more the child will be stigmatized. In this regard, the Committee also refers to article 37 (d) of CRC, where the child deprived of his/her liberty has the right to a prompt decision on his/her action to challenge the legality of the deprivation of his /her liberty. The term “prompt” is even stronger – and justifiably so given the seriousness of deprivation of liberty – than the term “without delay” (art. 40 (2) (b) (iii) CRC, which is stronger that the term “without undue delay” of article 14 (3) (c) of ICCPR.”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/ebdc9e098512f227d6012cb0193216ec046bb54cf3cced0d6f70157c62d46568. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt ebdc9e098512f227d6012cb0193216ec046bb54cf3cced0d6f70157c62d46568, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 23440 tot 24309.