Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 2 oktober 2015

Onder 2.11 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 2 oktober 2015

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 2 oktober 2015, ECLI:NL:PHR:2015:2043.

67. In determining whether that limitation to the applicant’s access to court pursued a legitimate aim, the Court is satisfied that, (…), granting immunity from German jurisdiction to the EPO aimed at guaranteeing the proper functioning of that international organisation. The Court has indeed previously stressed that the attribution of privileges and immunities to international organisations was an essential means of ensuring the proper functioning of such organisations free from unilateral interference by individual governments. Moreover, the immunity from jurisdiction commonly accorded by States to international organisations under the organisations’ constituent instruments or supplementary agreements was a long-standing practice established in the interest of the good working of these organisations. The importance of this practice was enhanced by a trend towards extending and strengthening international cooperation in all domains of modern society (…). Therefore, the immunity from jurisdiction applied by the Federal Constitutional Court to the EPO in the present case had a legitimate objective.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/6cbf73ab4c8a522ae41dc4b923adeffeafd0c2286ab73ef8a1ddd99bc0c1443e. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 6cbf73ab4c8a522ae41dc4b923adeffeafd0c2286ab73ef8a1ddd99bc0c1443e, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 38955 tot 40090.