Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 februari 2015

Onder 5.7. Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 februari 2015

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 17 februari 2015, ECLI:NL:PHR:2015:671.

“The right to education as enshrined in Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 by its very nature calls for regulation by the State, regulation which may vary in time and place according to the needs and resources of the community and of individuals (see Belgian linguistic case, judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, p. 32, § 5). Therefore, Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 implies the possibility for the State to establish compulsory schooling, be it in State schools or through private tuition of a satisfactory standard (see Family H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 10233/83, Commission decision of 6 March 1984, Decisions and Reports 37, p. 105, at p. 108; B.N. and S.N. v. Sweden, cited above; and Leuffen, cited above). The Court observes in this connection that there appears to be no consensus among the Contracting States with regard to compulsory attendance of primary schools. While some countries permit home education, other States provide for compulsory attendance of State or private schools.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/34b9d1dbc1f080ae15f525e2f1762fd4c3bfa93683c784f35bd7572f189fd2c3. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 34b9d1dbc1f080ae15f525e2f1762fd4c3bfa93683c784f35bd7572f189fd2c3, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 30286 tot 31295.