Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2015

Onder 2.15. Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2015

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 26 juni 2015, ECLI:NL:PHR:2015:991.

78. In the Court's view, in the circumstances of the present case it would have been reasonable to expect that the authorities, when responding to the applicant's efforts after July 1996 to have J.M's paternity challenged, would consider the relative weight of, on the one hand, the interests of the applicant as a putative biological father and, on the other, of the child and the family that the recognition by J.M. had created. While the Court acknowledges that it can be surmised that that the authorities, when giving their decisions after the child had been recognised by J. M. might not have wanted to disturb the legal relationship between the child and his mother's new partner, it is open to criticism that no examination of these interests against the factual background of a particular case has been effected or even considered. Moreover, it was not examined at all whether in the circumstances of the case the examination of the applicant's paternity would harm the child's interests or not.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/9dec42eb7a5d0e0f8807a5a4b42f61298c6cde0f526de312c90810bb11460d17. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 9dec42eb7a5d0e0f8807a5a4b42f61298c6cde0f526de312c90810bb11460d17, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 34987 tot 36005.