Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 september 2016

Onder 6.7 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 september 2016

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 september 2016, ECLI:NL:PHR:2016:1035.

“48. (…) An interference with the peaceful enjoyment of possessions must strike a fair balance between the demands of the general interests of the community and the requirements of the protection of the individual's fundamental rights. The concern to achieve this balance is reflected in the structure of Article 1 as a whole. The requisite balance will not be found if the person concerned has had to bear an individual and excessive burden (see, among other authorities, Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden, judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, pp. 26 and 28, §§ 69 and 73). In other words, there must be a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised (see, for instance, James and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A. no. 98, p. 34, § 50).”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/2be13e2bfe9dd51998cab47919afca2a929cbd65015997a0e790bbf1ed92794d. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 2be13e2bfe9dd51998cab47919afca2a929cbd65015997a0e790bbf1ed92794d, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 61120 tot 62020.