Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 8 november 2016

Onder 4.11. Parket bij de Hoge Raad 8 november 2016

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 8 november 2016, ECLI:NL:PHR:2016:1278.

The Commission considers that because of the principle according to which the Spanish Constitution overrides every ordinary law, and because of the role of the Constitutional Court, which is to act as the supreme interpreter of the Constitution (Article 1 of Institutional Act No 2/1979), there is no possibility that the impugned provision could form the basis in law, as the applicants allege, for infringements of lawyers’ rights to freedom of association. It notes in this connection that at no time have the applicants alleged that disciplinary sanctions have been imposed on them for forming or joining a professional association Moreover, there is nothing in the application as submitted by the applicants to support their contention that the provision at issue actually infringes or might in future infringe their right to set up professional associations or trade unions or to join those which already exist. That being the case, it follows that in this respect the application is also manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected pursuant to Article 27 para. 2 of the Convention.”

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/d497772c9b1d6cd6aa78faf751e4804b3513860c941f77bf7d7da915586ed46b. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt d497772c9b1d6cd6aa78faf751e4804b3513860c941f77bf7d7da915586ed46b, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 58023 tot 59142.