Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 8 november 2016

Onder 4.4. Parket bij de Hoge Raad 8 november 2016

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 8 november 2016, ECLI:NL:PHR:2016:1278.

101. It is true that the ACCAs owe their existence to the will of Parliament, but the Court notes that they are nevertheless associations set up in accordance with the Law of 1 July 1901, and are composed of hunters or the owners of land or hunting rights, and therefore of private individuals, all of whom, a priori, wish to pool their land for the purpose of hunting. Similarly, the fact that the prefect supervises the way these associations operate is not sufficient to support the contention that they remain integrated within the structures of the State (see, mutatis mutandis, the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. 26-27, § 64). Furthermore, it cannot be maintained that under the Loi Verdeille ACCAs enjoy prerogatives outside the orbit of the ordinary law, whether administrative, rule-making or disciplinary, or that they employ processes of a public authority, like professional associations.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/d497772c9b1d6cd6aa78faf751e4804b3513860c941f77bf7d7da915586ed46b. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt d497772c9b1d6cd6aa78faf751e4804b3513860c941f77bf7d7da915586ed46b, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 39062 tot 40039.