Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 februari 2016

Onder 7.5 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 februari 2016

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 februari 2016, ECLI:NL:PHR:2016:41.

69. As regards the personal burden which the applicant sustained on account of the impugned measure, the Court notes that she had to suffer a substantial deprivation of income in a period of considerable personal difficulty, namely that of unemployment. The Court would observe in this context that Article 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (see paragraph 19 above) endorses benefits providing protection in the case of loss of employment, and that according to the European Court of Justice, the aim pursued by severance – that is, helping dismissed employees find new employment – belongs within legitimate employment policy goals (see paragraph 19 above). For the Court, it is quite plausible that the element that she was subjected to the impugned measure while unemployed, together with the unexpected and swift nature of the change of the tax regime which made any preparation virtually impossible for those concerned, exposed the applicant to substantial personal hardships.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/7991adaa762e4c2c1606b091202588bb99d7f51e2079afcc0bc61647051a42f8. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 7991adaa762e4c2c1606b091202588bb99d7f51e2079afcc0bc61647051a42f8, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 86992 tot 88018.