Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 februari 2016

Onder 7.5 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 februari 2016

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 4 februari 2016, ECLI:NL:PHR:2016:41.

73. The Court moreover observes that the tax was imposed on income related to activities prior to the material tax year and realised in the tax year, on the applicant’s dismissal. In this connection the Court recalls that taxation at a considerably higher tax rate than that in force when the revenue in question was generated could arguably be regarded as an unreasonable interference with expectations protected by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see M.A. and 34 Others, cited above). The tax was determined in a statute that was enacted and entered into force some six weeks after the notification of the termination of the applicant’s civil service relationship, and the tax was not intended to remedy technical deficiencies of the pre-existing law, nor had the applicant enjoyed the benefit of a windfall in a changeover to a new tax-payment regime (compare and contrast, National etc., cited above, §§ 75 to 83).

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/7991adaa762e4c2c1606b091202588bb99d7f51e2079afcc0bc61647051a42f8. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 7991adaa762e4c2c1606b091202588bb99d7f51e2079afcc0bc61647051a42f8, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 89713 tot 90647.