Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 7 juli 2016

Onder 3.15 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 7 juli 2016

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 7 juli 2016, ECLI:NL:PHR:2016:786.

Against this background, the Court does not find that the decision and reasoning on compensation were incompatible with, and “set aside”, the applicant’s acquittal and amounted to the bringing of another “criminal charge” against her. On the other hand, it would not exclude that there were such links between the criminal case and the compensation case as to justify extending the scope of application of Article 6 § 2 to the latter. Meanwhile, even assuming that this provision was applicable to the compensation case, the Court does not find that the reasons given for ordering the applicant to compensate the insurance company for the damage caused were incompatible with the presumption of innocence.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/398f731b3bfad8b4556c9fabf9a26c25fe2957e71ee46a05082e4fb5d0eee162. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 398f731b3bfad8b4556c9fabf9a26c25fe2957e71ee46a05082e4fb5d0eee162, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 112131 tot 112860.