Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2017
Onder 3.7 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2017
Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2017, ECLI:NL:PHR:2017:654.
95. It appears that the existing legislative framework did not leave the judge another choice. The Russian Civil Code distinguishes between full capacity and full incapacity, but it does not provide for any “borderline” situation other than for drug or alcohol addicts. The Court refers in this respect to the principles formulated by Recommendation No. R (99) 4 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, cited above in paragraph 59. Although these principles have no force of law for this Court, they may define a common European standard in this area . Contrary to these principles, Russian legislation did not provide for a “tailor-made response”. As a result, in the circumstances the applicant’s rights under Article 8 were limited more than strictly necessary.
Zelf controleren
Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/058552416bcf7706c24612ef50cf1e64f3fca7c67d4cbb09f44de3d25f45a173. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 058552416bcf7706c24612ef50cf1e64f3fca7c67d4cbb09f44de3d25f45a173, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 39384 tot 40348.
$ curl -s https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/058552416bcf7706c24612ef50cf1e64f3fca7c67d4cbb09f44de3d25f45a173 | shasum -a 256