Citaat | Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2017

Onder 3.7 Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2017

Een alinea uit Parket bij de Hoge Raad 30 juni 2017, ECLI:NL:PHR:2017:654.

91. Second, the Court has already found that the proceedings before the Vasileostrovskiy District Court were procedurally flawed. Thus, the applicant did not take part in the court proceedings and was not even examined by the judge in person. Further, the applicant was unable to challenge the judgment of 28 December 2004, since the City Court refused to examine his appeal. In sum, his participation in the decision-making process was reduced to zero. The Court is particularly struck by the fact that the only hearing on the merits in the applicant’s case lasted ten minutes. In such circumstances it cannot be said that the judge had “had the benefit of direct contact with the persons concerned”, which normally would call for judicial restraint on the part of this Court.

Zelf controleren

Voor dit citaat hoeft niemand Bron op zijn woord te geloven. Het document dat rechtspraak.nl publiceerde, staat op https://bron.page/api/v1/blobs/058552416bcf7706c24612ef50cf1e64f3fca7c67d4cbb09f44de3d25f45a173. Wie het ophaalt en de SHA-256 ervan berekent, krijgt 058552416bcf7706c24612ef50cf1e64f3fca7c67d4cbb09f44de3d25f45a173, en de alinea staat in dat document op bytes 35999 tot 36853.